The AI workspace for small business
Run a small company like a much bigger one. An AI assistant that files what comes in, drafts what goes out, chases what's due, and answers anything about your business in seconds: the back office you never had to hire.
It runs on one clean workspace of your own files, set up for you - the same foundation that carries the big moves when they come: a major deal, a system change, a new venture. Built for businesses run by their owner; if you can use folders and email, you can run it.
Free, about an hour, on your own material. If it doesn't show clear value within 30 minutes, it stops there.
Scattered everywhere
An assistant pointed at this can search, at best.
One structured home
Every source connected and cross-referenced - so the assistant does the work, not just the lookup.
The hype is right that this is a game changer - businesses that adopt it well pull away from the ones that don't. But for most, "using AI" means a chat window, and a chat window only knows what you paste in.
Not a smarter search box - a capable colleague that does the work and hands back something finished.
It all comes down to your data. Most businesses run on information scattered across drives, inboxes, and people's heads - point an assistant at that and it can only search, at best. Organise it, give the assistant all of it, and it can genuinely run the business with you.
That unglamorous first step, structure, is the service. It's why everything after it works.
The people this fits keep looking alike: someone running a small company who wants it to act like a much bigger one. If any of these sound like you, a free demo on your own material will make the point.
The quotes, the follow-ups, the who-said-what to whom - it all runs through you. You want a business that keeps moving when you step away, without hiring an office manager to make it happen.
Drives, inboxes, a messaging app, a few spreadsheets, and a lot of it in your own head. Answering "what did we agree with that supplier?" means twenty minutes of digging.
Handy for a paragraph here and there, but it doesn't know your business, so it can't actually run any of it. You suspect there's a bigger gear, and there is.
An acquisition, a new system, a major build. Structure your information first and much of the upfront analysis is already done - the project starts cheaper and sharper, and you run it from the same workspace.
You don't need to be technical, and you don't need to tidy up first. The mess is the starting point - that's what the work is for.
It's Monday, 9am. Overnight, forty emails, a scanned supplier letter, an order, a couple of invoices and a signed contract landed. You sit down, start the morning routine with one command, and by the time your coffee's finished, each has been read, filed, and acted on. You didn't open a single folder.
Overnight, in
It works out what each thing is and what to do with it by reasoning over everything you keep.
Minutes later, done
No software gets built for any of this. It isn't a program written for each task - it's the AI reasoning over your organised data and the sources it's connected to, then acting.
A supplier renewal notice
becomes
A flag: the price crept up - confirm or switch, before it locks in.
A customer's order
becomes
Lines checked against live webshop prices, the buyer matched to your records, a confirmation drafted on your letterhead.
A signed contract
becomes
The deal promoted from prospect to a live project, every link repointed, the brief pulled together.
It goes further than filing
Filing is the floor, not the ceiling. The same assistant helps you plan and run the work itself: pulling a project brief together, checking a quote's numbers before it goes out, chasing the follow-ups a job depends on.
The routine work - filing, follow-ups, the morning brief - pays for the setup on its own. What people remember is the moments it does something nobody thought to ask it for. Four real ones:
A whole website, straight from the files
For a property-development partnership, a complete marketing website was generated straight from the workspace - no input from the owners needed, and they were shocked at how accurately it captured their business.
It checks the numbers behind a deal
Asked for a second pair of eyes on an investment case, it worked through a spreadsheet of complex financial calculations and caught the kind of subtle slips every complex model hides.
It finds money you're leaving on the table
My own financial admin is wired into Odoo, the accounting system. When a telecom or energy invoice lands, the assistant checks the market for a better deal and reports what switching would save per month - advice nobody asked for, from a bill it was only meant to file.
It steps into the technical work
In one working session it edited a technical drawing from a spoken instruction, caught and redid its own first attempt, then dropped the corrected version into a quote on the company's own letterhead.
This isn't a concept. It's how I run every part of my own life and business - one workspace per topic - and how a real multi-business operation runs day to day. The company runs on its own product; a committed post-acquisition engagement at a Belgian manufacturer starts next. Every row below is real, and running today.
It's also been put in front of outsiders: an AI training evening for consultants, IT managers, and CTOs, built around para-os - and the attendees asked to take the setup home.
And the method itself is public - you don't have to take my word for any of it:
Built by TrotStar Technologies
The open-source kit behind AI Workspace, free to use: PARA folders, plain-language house rules, and the skills that run them. Includes a fully worked example workspace you can poke at before you talk to me.
Want to see the shape first? The BelFoot example is a complete, fictional engagement you can read end to end.
Any "AI on top of your stuff" setup is three layers stacked. Most tools live in one or two of them and stay quiet about the rest.
The window a human drives or reads it through
VS Code · Obsidian · a chat app
The AI that reads and writes the files
Claude Code · Cursor · Codex · Claude Cowork
The files and how they're organised
PARA folders + house rules the assistant re-reads each session
Layer 1
This is the layer almost everyone skips, because it feels like filing, not engineering - and it's the one that makes every assistant above it actually work. It's a folder you copy, not a program you install - plain files on your own storage, organised so every "where does this go?" has one answer. Under the hood it's para-os, my free, open-source kit. I set it up for you; you keep it.
The folders follow PARA, a simple filing method sorted by how you act on things, not what topic they're about:
Time-bound work with a deliverable or deadline. One folder each.
Ongoing responsibilities and the people you deal with.
Reusable reference, and ideas not yet committed to projects.
Anything finished or inactive, kept for the record.
A capture inbox for anything you can't file in ten seconds. The assistant does the filing, so capture stays frictionless.
Work has stages: first an idea, then a live project, then the archive. Most tools make you file all three the same way and leave the moving to you. Here the assistant carries each piece of work from one stage to the next - and at every stage it keeps the same one-page brief and live to-do list, so you can always ask "what's the status?" and "what do I still owe on it?" and get the answer from the file, not from someone's memory.
Something you're mulling sits in a light folder with a one-page brief and a short to-do list. No pressure, nothing lost.
When it gets real - money on the table, a deadline, someone waiting - the assistant promotes the whole folder and repoints every link so nothing is orphaned.
When it closes, it's filed away in one pass: open items reconciled, links repointed. Out of your "what's live" view, still searchable years later.
The same story, in real life
Take a big new client you're chasing. It starts as a prospect in a light folder; when the email lands to say you've won the contract, the assistant promotes it to an active project, repoints every link, and pulls the brief together for your kickoff. When the work wraps, it's archived in one pass.
Layer 2
The AI that reads and writes those files. Claude Code is the pick today because it works best on this kind of workspace, but the files are plain text any capable assistant can read. The whole field is moving this way - and the edge belongs to whoever structured the files, not the model.
It's also the layer that reaches the rest of your world, wiring the workspace into the systems your work already lives in - ready-made connectors where they exist:
And it comes with ready-made commands for the recurring chores, one each, plus custom ones I build around how your business actually works:
Bring your own agent
You're never locked in. As assistants get better, clean files get more valuable, not less - and when a better one arrives, you point it at the same workspace and keep everything.
Layer 3
The window you drive or read it through - in practice, VS Code with Claude Code, simplified so it's no harder than working with folders and documents. You ask in plain language, the assistant edits the files, and the document refreshes in front of you. If you can use folders and email, you can run it.

A clean picture of your whole company shows what software you actually need: a new ERP, something lighter, or nothing new at all. "Nothing new" comes up more than the software industry likes to admit. A CRM, a follow-up tracker, a spend dashboard - most point tools are just structured information plus questions, and an assistant over clean files answers them without another subscription.
It doesn't replace your ERP - it sits alongside it.
The ERP keeps the rigid finance, orders, and inventory core; the workspace is the flexible day-to-day layer around it. And structuring first makes the ERP decision better: you commit knowing what you actually need, which makes any later rollout cheaper and faster.
The software call is just the start. Whatever the clean picture calls for - a new ERP, custom agents that carry a real workload, automations, training your team, or a custom build - the same engagement delivers it. Twenty-plus years across every role in the delivery lifecycle is what makes an open-ended starting point safe.
It comes back to one rule: structure before decisions. Once your information is legible, every call that matters - pricing, hiring, which customers to chase, what to buy - gets made on a clear picture.
Phased, hands-on, and safe to stop: every phase adds into the same workspace and ends production-ready, so you can stop at the end of any phase and keep something live. Continuing is a choice earned by results, not a contract. Expect weeks, not months, and value from the first phase.
It starts with a conversation - no pitch deck, no sales process. Then a free demo built live on your own material: something concrete in hand by the end of the meeting, at no charge.
Agree the high-level outcome the engagement points at, so there's a named destination before money changes hands.
The first paid phase: map the landscape - licences, mailboxes, shared drives, tools, where data lives and who owns it. Its first output is a realistic estimate for everything after.
Wire the workspace to the sources discovery surfaced: mail, shared folders, document systems, your webshop - ready-made connectors where they exist, ones the assistant writes where they don't.
Get what lives in people's heads into the workspace, and process the existing material source by source into usable outputs: customer and supplier profiles, searchable archives, process flows.
With the clean picture in place, the follow-on work chooses itself - the software decision, agents, automation, training, and a light monthly review to keep the workspace clean.

I'm Vincent Weijburg. Twenty-plus years across every role in the software delivery lifecycle, from developer and business analyst to enterprise architect and team lead, for organisations ranging from global consultancies and energy companies to international institutions. The thread through all of it: structure first, then build - and being direct about what's needed, even when it's not what people want to hear.
Then, six months ago, I discovered Claude Code, and it changed my view of what IT can do. Work that used to take a team and a budget now happens in days, when the foundation is right. That's why I built this: big-company leverage, set up for businesses run by their owner.
Every conversation starts with a working demo on your own material. If it doesn't show clear value within 30 minutes, it stops there.
No pressure to oversell, extend engagements, or recommend complex solutions when simple ones work. Sometimes the honest answer is that you don't need new technology at all.
Work runs in phases, and every phase ends with something concrete and production-ready in your hands. Stopping is always safe; continuing is earned by results.
Every engagement ends with something you run yourself - plain files on your own storage that keep working whether or not I'm around. Retainer dependency is a sign of failure, not success.
Some of the organisations I've worked with across a 20+ year consulting career.


One conversation, then a demo built live on your own material. If it doesn't show clear value within 30 minutes, it stops there.
Based in Belgium - demos, interviews, and working sessions on site across the country; remote-friendly for the Netherlands and wider Europe.